首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk allocation and competition in foraging groups: reversed effects of competition if group size varies under risk of predation.
【2h】

Risk allocation and competition in foraging groups: reversed effects of competition if group size varies under risk of predation.

机译:觅食群体的风险分配和竞争:如果群体规模在捕食风险的影响下发生变化,则竞争的反向作用。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Animals often feed more quickly when in larger groups. This group-size effect is often explained by safety advantages for groups but an alternative explanation is that animals feed faster in larger groups because of greater scramble competition for limited food. We show that predation risk enhances the group-size effect if groups vary in size. By contrast, competition leads to the group-size effect only when individuals feed in groups of constant size. When individuals feed in groups that vary in size, the best strategy for dealing with competition is to feed intensely when in smaller groups and feed little when in larger (more competitive) groups. In all situations, the effects of competition interact with the effects of predation risk in a simple multiplicative way. Our results suggest that scramble competition is not a general explanation for the group-size effect on vigilance in situations where group size changes relatively rapidly.
机译:当动物成群时,它们通常会更快地进食。群体规模的影响通常可以通过群体的安全优势来解释,但是另一种解释是,由于争夺有限食物的竞争加剧,动物在更大的群体中的进食速度更快。我们表明,如果群体规模不同,则捕食风险会增强群体规模效应。相比之下,竞争只有在个体喂食恒定大小的群体时才导致群体规模效应。当个人在规模不同的群体中进食时,应对竞争的最佳策略是在较小的群体中进食激烈,而在较大(更具竞争性)的群体进食很少。在所有情况下,竞争的影响都以简单的乘法方式与掠夺风险的影响相互作用。我们的结果表明,在小组规模变化相对较快的情况下,争夺竞争并不是对小组规模对警惕性影响的一般解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号